Moderator: Ray Clark
Presenter(s): Michael Smith
Climate change has recently emerged as an important topic in EIA. In the United States, analysis of climate change impacts in NEPA documents is a fairly recent development. Many NEPA documents today contain no such analysis. This presentation will review the current status of litigation related to climate change and NEPA, and discuss examples of early attempts to address climate change in NEPA documents.
Presenter(s): Ray Clark
Climate change will have multiple effects on the environment, economy, national security, agriculture, trade and commerce. In November 2007, the Ninth Circuit ruled that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration must prepare an EIS to assess greenhouse gas emissions attributable to new automobile fuel efficiency standards. Accordingly, policy and science implications for federal agencies addressing environmental and other effects will be summarized, as well as the consequences of emerging legislation and analytical expectations of the courts, Congress and public.
Presenter(s): Norval Collins
The need to incorporate climate change into the EIA process is becoming more urgent, but a number of road blocks are identified. The potential for CEA to play a critical initial role is made based on minimal change to the overall process, simpler guidelines, and ease of regulatory buy-in. The pros and cons of using CEA to further incorporation of climate change in the EIA process are identified, with experience drawn from the IAIA climate change list serve.
Presenter(s): Madaka Tumbo, Emilian Kihwele
Shifts in the extremes of climatic parameters such as temperature and moisture will have impacts on biodiversity, although it is difficult to predict to what extent because the ability of many species or ecosystems to respond to change in climatic extremes is unknown. Mitigation and adaptation is urgently required to reduce climate change impacts on biodiversity. Many of the people most vulnerable to climate change and its impacts are also those that are most dependent on biodiversity.
Moderator: Charlotte Bingham
Presenter(s): Lennart Folkeson, Hans Antonson, J-O Helldin
Suggestions to improve CEA in infrastructure planning were retrieved using focus groups comprising Swedish EIA/SEA professionals. Discussants suggested shifting focus from EIS to the EIA process, unconventional means of dialogue with actor groups, efficient teamwork between professionals, well-considered engagement of specialists vs. generalists, CEA integration in infrastructure planning, cooperation with spatial planning, development of CEA tools and widening their use, stronger incentives to raise CEA quality and status, experience from follow-up and development of the procurement instrument.
Presenter(s): Abdissa Megersa Debela
It is evident that adequate road transport service is essential for the economic and social development of a country. In 1997, the government of Ethiopia placed increased emphasis on improving the quality and quantity of the road infrastructure and formulated a development program. The past technical and scientific gaps in the road infrastructure planning and implementation procedures, in terms of adequately addressing environmental issues, have become one of the reasons that led to this research.
Presenter(s): Daniel Franks, David Brereton, Chris Moran
With the ongoing rapid expansion of coal mining in Australia, cumulative (or multi-mine) community, economic and environmental impacts are assuming growing importance and rendering conventional mine-by-mine approaches to change ineffective. In this paper we detail efforts to enhance the capacity of the Australian coal mining industry to identify, assess, manage and monitor cumulative community, economic and environmental impacts and we report on progress toward the development of a good practice guide on managing cumulative impacts.
Presenter(s): Paul Pettit, Terry Grotbo
Two Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statements expand upon the cumulative effects analyses originally presented in the Leeville and SOAPA gold mining projects EISs and incorporate qualitative and quantitative data collected since the original EISs were completed, expanded analyses of cumulative effects of the projects combined with other mining and land uses, and descriptions of analytical processes used to determine cumulative effects. Issues include air quality, water quantity and quality, vegetation resources, terrestrial wildlife and riparian and wetland resources.
Moderator: Nick Taylor
Presenter(s): Vicki McCulloch
The framework for assessing and managing cumulative effects in the Northwest Territories and Nunavut, Canada, continues to evolve. The challenges related to cumulative effects assessment and management generally are arguably more complex with respect to the social, cultural and economic aspects of the environment. This presentation will focus on the existing and emerging tools for more effective assessment of social, cultural and economic cumulative effects—including monitoring and adaptive management—both at a project-specific and regional context.
Presenter(s): Bonnie Evans
This paper will provide:
Presenter(s): Marvin Stemeroff, Heidi Klein, Tomasz Wlodarczyk, Andy Keir
Traditional approaches to socioeconomic impact assessment have served project proponents and communities in the past. The current situation is different. Employment and income opportunities abound in resource-rich regions. The promise of jobs is not enough. The new focus is long-term community well-being with attention on enhancing human, social, physical, financial and natural assets. This requires a new approach for socioeconomic impact assessment. This paper illustrates one approach to incorporating community well-being into socioeconomic impact assessment.
Presenter(s): Viktoryia Misiuchenka
Today in the Republic of Belarus there is lack of normative and legislative documents on the assessment and monitoring of cumulative consequences of the environmental pollution. There is a list (15 groups) of pollutants of additive harmful effect. These groups are made up by means of summing up the values of maximum permissible concentration of separate pollutants.
Moderator: Nick Taylor
Presenter(s): Vicki McCulloch
The framework for assessing and managing cumulative effects in the Northwest Territories and Nunavut, Canada, continues to evolve. The challenges related to cumulative effects assessment and management generally are arguably more complex with respect to the social, cultural and economic aspects of the environment. This presentation will focus on the existing and emerging tools for more effective assessment of social, cultural and economic cumulative effects—including monitoring and adaptive management—both at a project-specific and regional context.
Presenter(s): Bonnie Evans
This paper will provide:
Presenter(s): Marvin Stemeroff, Heidi Klein, Tomasz Wlodarczyk, Andy Keir
Traditional approaches to socioeconomic impact assessment have served project proponents and communities in the past. The current situation is different. Employment and income opportunities abound in resource-rich regions. The promise of jobs is not enough. The new focus is long-term community well-being with attention on enhancing human, social, physical, financial and natural assets. This requires a new approach for socioeconomic impact assessment. This paper illustrates one approach to incorporating community well-being into socioeconomic impact assessment.
Presenter(s): Viktoryia Misiuchenka
Today in the Republic of Belarus there is lack of normative and legislative documents on the assessment and monitoring of cumulative consequences of the environmental pollution. There is a list (15 groups) of pollutants of additive harmful effect. These groups are made up by means of summing up the values of maximum permissible concentration of separate pollutants.
Moderator: TBA
Special Events
Oil and Gas Developments (Part 1)
Presenter(s): Dan Kellar
The 2010 Winter Olympics are being held in the Vancouver-Whistler Corridor. Twenty projects are directly linked to the Olympics and most of these projects had an EIA undertaken to assess their impacts, yet these projects were all assessed in isolation from one another. This paper will discuss the failures of the Canadian EIA process in dealing with the cumulative effects of multi-site development projects and the weaknesses in assessing cumulative environmental effects at individual project sites.
Presenter(s): Robin Cockell, Steven Strawson, Trevor Cuthbert
The current pace of development in Alberta’s Oil Sands Region has made CEAs the focus of a global audience. While these CEAs are subject to more scrutiny, they are likely supported by more regional data/research than any other EIAs in the world. Advancements in methods have provided greater understanding of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, but also highlighted related challenges. This presentation will review how Oil Sands CEAs are being completed, and discuss challenges and opportunities facing EIA practitioners.
Presenter(s): Bjorn Serigstad, Marek Ostrowski, Bomba Basika Sangoloy
Temperature, salinity, light conditions, etc., may have stronger impacts on a test organism than does the chemical itself. The design of biotests should be based on the information of the living resources and their natural environment in the area of concern. These requirements are somewhat contradictory to an overall wish for standard test methods. In Angola, such activities are in progress and will be supported by Norway. Our research vessel, Dr. Fridtjof Nansen, is an effective tool for these studies.
Moderator: Charlotte Bingham
Presenter(s): Douglas Ouma
Cumulative environmental effects which are often not obvious and not profiled are the small scale community based activities. Activities which are “small” and “not significant” during construction accumulate over time, presenting serious cumulative environmental effects/impacts. CIANEA network promotes good practice of small scale community based activities implemented within principles of environmentally sound design. This paper shows its best practice guide and a case study of the successful implementation water programmes in South Sudan and its replication in eastern Africa.
Presenter(s): Vaniah Emode Andrianjaka
In Madagascar, small scale projects occur everywhere. Due to the size of investment, good practice is ignored. This paper will show the situation of the effort that is being carried out in the country and will examine the experience with the cumulative effects assessment and management in order to present the problems met and to discuss the improvement required.
Presenter(s): Weston Fisher
CEA is needed for USAID overseas mission programs at the strategic level. No examples currently appear to exist where CEA has been effectively applied and there are no specific USAID regulatory requirements to do so. However, missions and their implementing partners could apply CEA together with host countries and other donors in the USAID Country Strategic Planning (CSP) process. Recommendations to USAID and other donors, especially on institutional approaches to CEA for small-scale activities, are encouraged from CEA practitioners.
Presenter(s): Ashok Pachauri
The Himalayas are the most active mountains in the world and most vulnerable to natural hazards, especially landslide and earthquakes. Since gravity plays an important role in landslide generation, the rugged terrain is a natural depository of landslides. The landslides have been modifying landscapes in the Himalayas since the Pleistocene glaciation period. The cumulative effects of these are seen in the accumulation of landslide debris on various slopes. The article discusses possible terrain features for cumulative storage.
Moderator: Charlotte Bingham
Oil and Gas Developments (Part 2)
Presenter(s): Bomba Basika Sangolay, Lia Sousa Neto, Bjorn Serigstad, Gisle Vassenden
Offshore oil industry and fisheries are among the most important industries in Angola. To avoid conflicts between the different users of the sea, the authorities in Angola have created a monitoring plan called “Environmental Monitoring of the Petroleum Activities on the Angolan Continental Shelf.” This plan is based on the Norwegian and OSPAR guidelines. In 2006 three oil fields operated by Chevron were investigated in a training program for Angolan scientists. Results from this survey will be presented.
Presenter(s): Gisle Vassenden, Ingunn Nilsen
The offshore regional monitoring programme for petroleum activities on the Norwegian continental shelf began in 1996. The regional monitoring approach replaced the single field approach which has been applied since the early 1980s. The goal of the regional monitoring program is to assess potential impacts and provide information to the industry and management authorities. This presentation is based on experiences from the monitoring programme and is illustrated by result from an oilfield in the North Sea.
Presenter(s): Arnold Waiswa Ayazika
Oil exploration and development activities are a new phenomenon in Uganda and are likely to have significant impacts, and effective assessment and mitigation needs a thorough understanding of operations and hazards. Knowledge about strategic environmental assessment in Uganda is still limited and therefore traditional EIA is being carried out for every potential location even with those with similar baseline information. This approach leads to a waste of time and doesn’t provide information on the cumulative impacts of these activities.
Presenter(s): Atma Khalsa, Dean Slocum
Recognizing that cumulative impacts are a business risk, the oil and gas industry has recently attempted to integrate CEA into their Environmental, Social and Health Impact Assessment and Risk Assessment procedures. As one of the main shortcomings of CEA is the lack of tools, methods and mechanisms for evaluating these impacts, this paper will describe examples of how oil and gas companies are addressing these concerns and will highlight some of the main challenges they have faced.
Moderator: Robin Senner
Presenter(s): John Page
Infrastructure projects are not created equal. Project features and the characteristics of their setting differ substantially from project-to-project. Thus, the scopes of cumulative impact assessments also differ substantially from project-to-project. This paper examines concepts for scoping the level-of-effort for cumulative impacts assessment from the perspectives of project purpose, activities, context, and area of influence. Application is demonstrated from the perspective of eight US transportation projects.
Presenter(s): Robin Senner
Even with an increasing number of agency guidance manuals, practitioners frequently encounter problems conducting cumulative effects assessments. This paper recommends proven ways to make the process faster and easier while keeping it fully in compliance with regulatory guidance and, most important, substantive, evidence-based, and useful to the public. These include new ways of approaching public scoping and agency consultation, crafting the Affected Environment description, and structuring the Environmental Consequences analyses and discussions.
Presenter(s): Javier Clausen, Sergio Contreras
In the last 50 years, several medium and large dams have been built across the Santiago River. A CEA was initiated by the University of Guadalajara and the Mexican Federal Electricity Commission, aimed to address the cumulative effects of infrastructure and induced actions on the watershed ecosystems. At scoping stage, VECs potentially affected have been identified. Adoption of appropriate indicators, participatory mechanisms and multidisciplinary approaches will be discussed as main challenges for the CEA, first of its kind in Mexico.
Presenter(s): Bruce Muir
For the conservation of grizzly bears to be achieved, an integrative planning framework is required for identifying the cumulative effects of anthropogenic activities caused by the implementation of British Columbia’s tenure system. Developed under the Mountain Dunne-za Planning Initiative, this framework is based on a review of the land use characteristics of tenures and the potential for adverse effects. Using GIS, the framework is applied to three community planning areas that intersect with the Peace River Corridor.
Moderator: Charlotte Bingham
Other Energy-Based Developments
Presenter(s): Leszek Preisner, Tadeusz Pindor
Coal is still one of the main primary energy sources on a world scale. Industrial production of hydrogen using different methods requires an energy supply, which comes from coal and the burning of other fuels. This means that fossil fuels will be used. The rapid growth in prices of crude oil and natural gas has meant that liquid fuels produced from coal has received new attention. A particular growth of interest in this respect appears in countries that posses large coal mineral resources, but have no sufficient crude oil reserves.
Presenter(s): Masud Hasan, Stephen Parsons
The ESIA for the Peru LNG Projects (PLNG) did not fully address potential cumulative environmental and social effects. A CEA was prepared to ensure that the incremental effects resulting from the combined influences of the PLNG are considered in conjunction with the effects of other projects currently operating or proposed for the general area, recognizing that these incremental effects may be significant even though the effects of each activity, when independently assessed, may be considered small or insignificant.
Moderator: Bill Ross
Presenter(s): Michael Smith
This presentation will focus on practical steps EIA practitioners can take to prepare their cumulative impact analyses in a manner that takes into account recent court decisions. A review of recent cases challenging the cumulative impact analyses contained in US NEPA documents will focus on key practical steps that practitioners can take to prepare more legally-defensible analyses.
Presenter(s): Leslie Wildesen
Current practice in US CEA is hampered because most practitioners misunderstand the purpose, concepts, values, outcomes, tools and methods of CEA, and because of the fragmented and contradictory nature of CEA guidance. Best practice approaches to improvement include more training, sector guidelines, regional baselines, access to centralized databases, integration with environmental management systems, and emphasis on sustainability.
Presenter(s): Steve J. Bonnell, Jeffrey L. Barnes
CEA often requires consideration of a Project’s environmental effects in combination with past, present and future developments. Considering past effects and defining an appropriate temporal boundary is often a key challenge, and has resulted in uncertainty and inconsistency in CEA–including at times an expectation that a pre-development, “pristine” environment forms the baseline. This paper discusses experiences and challenges in considering past projects and effects, and explores approaches to doing so in a more practical and meaningful manner.
Moderator: Ray Clark
Presenter(s): Michael Smith
Climate change has recently emerged as an important topic in EIA. In the United States, analysis of climate change impacts in NEPA documents is a fairly recent development. Many NEPA documents today contain no such analysis. This presentation will review the current status of litigation related to climate change and NEPA, and discuss examples of early attempts to address climate change in NEPA documents.
Presenter(s): Ray Clark
Climate change will have multiple effects on the environment, economy, national security, agriculture, trade and commerce. In November 2007, the Ninth Circuit ruled that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration must prepare an EIS to assess greenhouse gas emissions attributable to new automobile fuel efficiency standards. Accordingly, policy and science implications for federal agencies addressing environmental and other effects will be summarized, as well as the consequences of emerging legislation and analytical expectations of the courts, Congress and public.
Presenter(s): Norval Collins
The need to incorporate climate change into the EIA process is becoming more urgent, but a number of road blocks are identified. The potential for CEA to play a critical initial role is made based on minimal change to the overall process, simpler guidelines, and ease of regulatory buy-in. The pros and cons of using CEA to further incorporation of climate change in the EIA process are identified, with experience drawn from the IAIA climate change list serve.
Presenter(s): Madaka Tumbo, Emilian Kihwele
Shifts in the extremes of climatic parameters such as temperature and moisture will have impacts on biodiversity, although it is difficult to predict to what extent because the ability of many species or ecosystems to respond to change in climatic extremes is unknown. Mitigation and adaptation is urgently required to reduce climate change impacts on biodiversity. Many of the people most vulnerable to climate change and its impacts are also those that are most dependent on biodiversity.
Moderator: Leslie Wildesen
Presenter(s): Angus Morrison-Saunders
Although environmental impact assessment (EIA) procedures in Western Australia have been internationally acclaimed, the policy and practice of cumulative effects assessment (CEA) is highly variable. All EIAs are meant to consider CEA but practice is patchy. Quantified cumulative loss thresholds in recent EIA guidance documents along with offset requirements offer promise for great improvement in CEA. Drawing on policy and practice examples this paper will attempt to understand the situation with reference to experience elsewhere in the world.
Presenter(s): Angeles Mendoza Sammet
Cumulative Effects (CE) are evaluated in Mexico only for projects or activities belonging to the regional modality. Reports submitted for approval to the Secretariat of the Environment and Natural Resources (SEMARNAT) are examined to determine whether the review process is effective to evaluate CE and the adequacy of mitigation measures. Changes to the environmental legislation and the review process are recommended to improve the effectiveness of the EIA process and practice in Mexico.
Presenter(s): George Hegmann, Tony Yarranton
The certainty of substantial future hydrocarbon development in Canada’s west and arctic is contrasted against uncertainty in details of what and where those developments, and their environmental response, may be. The future of a meaningful cumulative assessment of these changes is found within an understanding of how science, the will of government, perception of risk and global energy demand collectively shape the future, creating a context within which energy development may continue but with management effective and compromises clear.
Presenter(s): Charlotta Faith-Ell, Bengt Eriksson
Previous studies have shown that the practice of assessing cumulative impacts in Swedish EIA has been almost non-existent. However, recent court rulings regarding tunneling projects indicate clearer guidance from government. This paper builds on a study of the City Tunnel project and the City Line project. The aim is to give an introduction to the current situation, an analysis of the court rulings and a discussion of the potential implications on the future practice in Sweden.