IAIA22 presenting authors were invited to submit papers; participation was optional. Below are the draft papers of the contributing authors. Please feel free to use these drafts to prepare questions or suggestions for the authors on-site.

Final papers corresponding to these drafts will be posted after IAIA22.

• 278_Mortara_HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT FIT
• 278_Mortara_HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT FIT
• 50th Anniversary of NEPA: Summary of influential U.S. court decisions
• A Bottleneck in the Biodiversity Offsets Adoption in EIA Systems of Japan
• An HSI model of Sasakia charonda for SATOYAMA conservation activities
• ANTAMINA: TRANSFORMING 25 YEARS OF DATA TO A BIODIVERSIY CONSERVATION TOOL
• Are resources sufficient for the evaluation of social impacts of resource projects?
• Assessing impacts that matter to people: practical examples of assessing psycho-social impacts in environmental impact assessments
• BASELINING IN THE ANTHROPOCENE: VULNERABILITY OF THE EIA PROCESS TO THE CLIMATE CRISIS
• Canada Energy Regulator - A Lifecycle Approach to Contamination Remediation
• Caribou habitat and Federal pipeline oversight in Canada
• Caribou habitat and Federal pipeline oversight in Canada
• Cedar, Salmon and ICCAs
• Challenges in Assessing Social Impacts on ICCAs: A Central Asia Gold Mine
• Closing the Gap between National Requirements and International Standards in Social Impact Assessments: Case Study of a Mining Project in Argentina
• Coconstruct tools with territorial stakeholders
• Collaboration in Action: Applying the sÌŒxÊ·kÊ·ecxÉ™nÉ™m Framework for Environmental Assessments in Tsawwassen First Nation’s Territory
• Collaborative Assessments: Melding Indigenous Wants with Project Proponent Needs
• Digital EIA: Delivering more effective, efficient, engaging assessments
• Don't Shoot Yourself in the Foot: Re-thinking Environmental Management Plans
• Don’t Shoot Yourself in the Foot: Rethinking Environmental Management Plans
• Early lessons in holistic inclusion of Indigenous Knowledge in Impact Assessment
• EIA: A Model to Facilitate Strategic Planning and Performance Management
• Environmental Stewardship Initiative Lake Babine Nation Wetland Case Study
• ESG trends on the mining industry. Are we prepared?
• ESMF Rural Development and Climate Resilience Project Gilgit Baltistan
• Evolution in Guidance for EIA Implementation as a Confidence Building Measure: A Comparative Case Study of Brazil, Chile, and Colo
• Gender, Barriers, Perceptions and Inclusivity
• How incorporating ESG concepts is reshaping Chilean mining projects
• IA for Fragile and Conflict States in a Post-COVID context
• IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND JUST SUSTAINABILITY TRANSITION: EXPLORING INTERSECTIONS
• Improving our language in describing disturbed sites that are planned for new development
• Improving Regulatory Efficiency with Readability
• KPMA’s Wetland Classification Handbook to Improve Confidence in Impact Assessment
• Managing Socio-economic Effects During Major Project Construction
• Mining Liabilities in Chile, Toward a National Law
• Mining Liabilities in Chile, Toward a National Law
• NEPA Beyond 50: EIA for Infrastructure Investment
• New Remote Technologies for SEA in Asia: Maritime Heritage and Beyond
• Public Participation and Involvement in Uganda's EIAs for Processing and Manufacturing Industries
• Public Participation and Involvement in Uganda's EIAs for Processing and Manufacturing Industries
• Public Participation in Impact Assessment- Experiences from Nepal
• Reconciling Net Value in Social Impact Assessment and Monitoring
• Scoping in a complex world: an appeal for a broad focus? Lessons learned from the Netherlands
• St. Lawrence River Regional Assessment: Planning with Indigenous partners
• SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND EIA IN ARGENTINA, TWO INTERRELATED KEY POINTS
• Thinking of SIA through a construction lens
• Unfinished conversations: Honouring Indigenous relationships and knowledges in IA
• Use of Acoustic Models to Assess Southern Resident Killer Whale (SRKW) Mitigation and Address Uncertainty Regarding Marine Shipping
• Using secondary data to assess knowledge uptake and influence of the Rio Doce Panel
• When projects change after assessment: The Ship of Theseus, creeping baseline and cumulative baseline

Go Back